<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Human Distribution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jbordeaux.com/human-distribution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jbordeaux.com/human-distribution/</link>
	<description>with John Bordeaux</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 22:52:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3592</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://jbordeaux.com/human-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drfuzzy.wordpress.com/?p=22#comment-289</guid>
		<description>I agree with the tendency, but I believe it is entirely wrong-headed.  You ought not attempt to control people or groups as you do a car or razor.  Attempting to control, rather than influence, assumes you have all the information necessary for success. 

What if the people you are trying to control have something to teach?  What if their aggregated behaviors indicate the need for a change - do to opportunity or threat - in your leadership objectives or strategy?

Giving in to human tendencies leads to the opposite of a &quot;learning organization,&quot; and completely antithetical to what we are learning about human capital management, complex adaptive (organizational) systems, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with the tendency, but I believe it is entirely wrong-headed.  You ought not attempt to control people or groups as you do a car or razor.  Attempting to control, rather than influence, assumes you have all the information necessary for success. </p>
<p>What if the people you are trying to control have something to teach?  What if their aggregated behaviors indicate the need for a change &#8211; do to opportunity or threat &#8211; in your leadership objectives or strategy?</p>
<p>Giving in to human tendencies leads to the opposite of a &#8220;learning organization,&#8221; and completely antithetical to what we are learning about human capital management, complex adaptive (organizational) systems, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Khürt</title>
		<link>http://jbordeaux.com/human-distribution/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Khürt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 13:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://drfuzzy.wordpress.com/?p=22#comment-288</guid>
		<description>Q: What is wrong with managing people as they naturally organize, rather than try to force human beings into a bell curve?

I think it is a natural tendency of human beings to want to control their environment for maximum benefit.  The challenge is that as a person becomes more successful or rises in positional authority controlling the environment leads to controlling others.  Now they have the power to do it because they are the CEO or chief EGO officer.  This is how I see things.  I reserve the right to be completely wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q: What is wrong with managing people as they naturally organize, rather than try to force human beings into a bell curve?</p>
<p>I think it is a natural tendency of human beings to want to control their environment for maximum benefit.  The challenge is that as a person becomes more successful or rises in positional authority controlling the environment leads to controlling others.  Now they have the power to do it because they are the CEO or chief EGO officer.  This is how I see things.  I reserve the right to be completely wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

